REST vs gRPC
Overview Comparison
gRPC | REST | |
Protocol | HTTP/2 (faster) | HTTP/1.1 (slower) |
Payload | Protobuf (binary, small) | JSON (text, large) |
API contract | Typed, required (.proto) | Optional (OpenAPI) |
Code generation | Built-in (protoc) | Third-party (Swagger) |
Security | TLS/SSL | TLS/SSL |
Streaming | Bidirectional | Client to Server |
Browser support | Limited | Yes |
When to use each gRPC?
Microservices
Low latency + high throughput
Strong API contracts
Services implemented in different languages
Streaming is needed.
Network constrained environments
Lighter weight messages
Main pains of gRPC
Contract management and code generation
A strict API contract in environments with regular updates in contracts.
Last updated