REST vs gRPC

Overview Comparison

gRPC

REST

Protocol

HTTP/2 (faster)

HTTP/1.1 (slower)

Payload

Protobuf (binary, small)

JSON (text, large)

API contract

Typed, required (.proto)

Optional (OpenAPI)

Code generation

Built-in (protoc)

Third-party (Swagger)

Security

TLS/SSL

TLS/SSL

Streaming

Bidirectional

Client to Server

Browser support

Limited

Yes

When to use each gRPC?

  • Microservices

    • Low latency + high throughput

    • Strong API contracts

  • Services implemented in different languages

  • Streaming is needed.

  • Network constrained environments

    • Lighter weight messages

Main pains of gRPC

  • Contract management and code generation

  • A strict API contract in environments with regular updates in contracts.

Last updated